Medtora versus other solutions

Medtora versus REDCap

Structured comparison for clinical projects, consent, surveys, participant workflows and data protection.

Feature Comparison MEDTORA REDCap
Core Platform Architecture
Unified project-based platform architecture
 Unified clinical platform with project-based architecture Project-based survey/database platform (research data capture focused)
Supports active and inactive project lifecycle
 ✓ Depends on institution setup
Scales across organizations and use cases
 ✓ ✓
User & Access Management
Role-based user access per project
 ✓ ✓
Flexible user types (employees, external users, orgs, caregivers)
 ✓ Custom / institution-defined
Project-level access control
 ✓ ✓
Data segregation by user groups / site access
 ✓ ✓
Surveys & Clinical Activities
Survey / form builder
 ✓ ✓
Clinical activities (surveys, tests, interviews) in project workflows
 ✓ Custom / project-configured
Longitudinal feedback tracking
 ✓ Possible, depends on project design
Configurable scoring models (0–10, Likert, etc.)
 ✓ Possible, configured per project
Patient experience / treatment satisfaction measurement
 ✓ Custom implementation
Consent & Compliance
eConsent as core platform capability
 ✓ Custom / setup dependent
Digital signing and document upload consent flow
 ✓ Custom / project-configured
Consent linked directly to participant workflow
 ✓ Custom
Audit-ready consent records
 ✓ Audit logging available; consent flow depends on setup
Compliance-first platform positioning (GDPR / clinical workflows)
 ✓ Compliance depends on local hosting and controls
Authentication & Security
Role-appropriate authentication model
 ✓ Depends on institution authentication setup
Multi-factor authentication options
 ✓ ✓
Authentication + secure access logging
 ✓ ✓
Built-in audit trail for user activity
 ✓ ✓
Document & Media Management
Document upload at project and participant level
 ✓ ✓
Audio and video file management
 ✓ File upload supported; media workflows depend on setup
Role-based access to documents and media
 ✓ User rights available; access model depends on setup
Participant Management
Structured participant management across project lifecycle
 ✓ Custom / process-defined
Participant access controlled per project
 ✓ Possible via project/user rights configuration
Automatic participant access changes when project becomes inactive
 ✓ Custom / institution process
Compliance retention with restricted access after project completion
 ✓ Depends on local retention and access policies
Data Protection & Retention
Controller / processor separation support
 ✓ Depends on institution contracts and hosting setup
Customer-controlled data storage architecture
 ✓ ✓
Cloud or on-prem flexibility
 Depends on deployment model ✓
Data-at-rest encryption built into application by default
 Depends on deployment architecture No (handled by hosting/infrastructure)
Compliance depends on local hosting/security controls
 More standardized platform approach ✓
Pricing & Operations
Pricing model
 € 1.540,-/month. active / € 603,-/month. inactive Varies depending on hosting, internal IT and/or external consultants.
For-profit access model
 B2B platform Varies depending on hosting, internal IT and/or external consultants.
Support
 Free support for all included Depends on institution setup and external consultants.